The (Lack of) Science behind the Body Mass Index (BMI)by If you have ever had a medical checkup, you have probably heard about the Body Mass Index (BMI) that it supposed to have an optimal value around 25. Probably you were told to take your weight in pounds, divide it by the square of your height in inches and multiply the result by 703 to find your BMI. If you are over 40 years old your BMI was most likely more than 25 and your doctor told you to lose weight. The multiplication by the mysterious number 703 tends to lend the measure an aura of scientific authority. However if were in Europe you need not worry about that mysterious number. To find your BMI you take your weight in kilograms and divide it by the square of your height in meters. The 703 is needed for converting pounds to kilograms and inches to meters. (You can tell right away the European origin of the measure.) Of course you can find your ideal weight in kilograms from the formula below, provided the height is expressed in meters. (By the way, this is the equation of a parabola.)
Let us now look at the results for people 1.60m (5 feet 3 inches), 1.70m (5 feet 7 inches), 1.80m (5 feet 11 inches), 1.90m (6 feet 2 inches) . The weights (in kilograms) we get from the formulas are respectively: 64, 72, 81, and 90. Do you notice that the weight comes to be close to the number expressed by the decimals in your height? When I was growing up in Greece doctors were saying that your ideal weight should be in kilograms equal to the number expressed by the decimals in your height. The mathematical formula for that is a linear equation.
The straight line of the linear equation is a tangent to the parabola of the quadratic equation and the two meet for height equal to 2 meters and weight equal to 100 kgs. However they are very close over a large area. For height 1.80m the difference of the equations is only 1kg and for height 1.70m is 2.25kg. Click to see a Diagram showing the relationship between the two with Equ. (1) in black and Equ. (2) in green. The agreement between the BMI formula (Equ. (1)) and a gross empirical relationship (Equ. (2)) made me suspicious and I started investigating. According to the Wikipedia article the BMI formula was derived by a Belgian "between 1830 and 1850". That seemed strange and I did some research on the internet and indeed the inventor of BMI is the Belgian (Flemish) mathematician Adolphe Quetelet (1796-1874). I also found several biographies of his on the internet (see list at the end of this article). Interestingly, the BMI formula did not become popular amongst physicians until well after 1970. What is the scientific basis for the formula? We have to go back to Quatelet and read that "in 1846 he published a book on probability and social science that demonstrated as diverse a collection of human measurements as the heights of French conscripts and the chest circumferences of Scottish soldiers could be taken as approximately normally distributed." (sites 2 and 3 listed below). Therefore the most likely explanation is that both the BMI and the linear expression of Equ. (2) were derived as a gross approximation to a set of observed weights and heights of recruits in a Western European army. An additional tiny piece of evidence for such an origin is the fact that my own weight when I was conscripted into the Greek Army was that given by Eqs (1) or (2). Next time your doctor brings up the BMI measure ask him/her what were the population data that the index was derived from. I find very disturbing to use a statistical measure derived over 150 years ago, most likely, from a group of young men to determine the proper weight for men and women of any age. There have been several publication critical of the BMI (see below) and if your doctor follows the literature, she/he may not mention BMI at all. There is another disturbing fact in Equ. (1). Why is the weight expressed as the square of the height? Elementary solid geometry tells us that the volume of an object is equal to the third power of its linear dimensions, so the weight should be proportional of the cube of the height. However strength is proportional to the cross section of your arms and legs, so it is proportional to the square of the height. As a result, the ratio of strength over volume is declining function of height and that is why insects are far more mobile than dogs and dogs are more mobile than humans. Because for any given person height is determined by genetics and childhood nutrition, it must be taken as a given. Then the formula for proper weight must contain both a cubic term (to account for the volume) and a quadratic term (to account for the need for strength). I have not seen any such formula, but using the BMI expression because we do not have an accurate expression does not seem to be the smart thing to do. There have been articles pointing out that BMI gives too low weights for tall people but the public is not aware of them. Another flaw of the formula (also recognized in the literature) is that it does not distinguish between weight due to muscle and weight due to fat. Again that knowledge is not widely available. If you have the patience to read the Wikipedia article to the end you will find a good critique of the BMI in the section "Limitations and shortcomings" where there are also citations to the literature. Yes, you must be concerned about gaining excess weight, but what is excess weight is not what the formula tells you. Your best bet is to find a health practitioner who takes a realistic view of weight and discuss the problem with that person. Biographical Information about Adolphe Quetelet1. http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Biographies/Quetelet.html Scientific Critiques of BMINot surprisingly, there have been several scientific studies that point out the weaknesses of the BMI. Below are links or references to some of them. Such studies are usually epidemiological, i.e. they look at mortality or illness of people and see how well that correlated with the BMI.
Several studies led by Dr. Katherine M. Flegal
Some Publications Related to the Use of BMI in ChildrenThe following citations were provided to me by my daughter Karen Pavlidis, PhD. She also directed my attention to several issues related to false alarms about an "obesity epidemic." Unfortunately, the journals are accessible through the web only to authorized users. You have to look for them through a University Library. While all four papers use the BMI, they also point out several problems with it.
Collections from the WebThere are several postings that provide critiques to the BMI index. Some of them are listed below in no particular order.
First Posted: Sept. 23, 2007 Return to main Health Issues page |
theopavlidis.com | Site Map |